A Conceptual Framework for Workforce Skills in Industry 5.0

2024 – Industry 5.0 is a relatively new topic and not yet well-defined. This article’s purpose is to develop understanding of Industry 5.0 by offering a new socio-centric conceptual framework. It extends prevailing perception of Industry 5.0 by integrating workforce skills, labor shortages, and eco-digital shifts. The study explores workforce skill measurement and its implementation. Three methods were combined to develop the conceptual framework: (i) review of academic and policy literature; (ii) scholarly and expert discussions; (iii) consultations with practitioners, companies and networks on Industry 5.0’s relevance. Industry 5.0 expands Industry 4.0’s technology-focused approach. This new paradigm emphasizes human-centricity, sustainability and resilience, infusing societal values into organizational management. Our findings suggest that, while firmly rooted in EU policy, Industry 5.0 must find integration at national levels and within pertinent ecosystems. This article introduces innovative perspectives on conceptualizing and evaluating workforce skills for Industry 5.0. Mitigating skills gaps is crucial in enabling companies and employees to leverage the eco-digital shift, fostering sustainability, resilience and equity across Europe. A limitation to understanding Industry 5.0 is that policy discussions run ahead of collecting empirical data. As a consequence, one must be careful in drawing firm conclusions. While prior research underscores the need for skilled workforces in Industry 5.0, it falls short of elucidating evolving job dynamics in the Industry 5.0 transition. This article addresses this gap by examining the evolving job landscape, skills, and learning trajectories.

Reference

Oeij, P.R.A., Lenaerts, K, Dhondt, S., Van Dijk, W., Schartinger, D., Sorko, S.R., Warhurst, C., (2024). A Conceptual Framework for Workforce Skills for Industry 5.0: Implications for Research, Policy and Practice, Journal of Innovation Management, 12(1), 205-233.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_012.001_00010

https://journalsojs3.fe.up.pt/index.php/jim/article/view/2547